National Book Critics Circle Prize Nominees Are Chosen

Post by Robert Cohen
If this *WALL STREET URINAL thing doesn't link, I betcha the Christian
Science Monitor, <csmonitor.com>
has this list or soon will as it has in the past
*Actually, the WSJ is seemingly a better "read" under the press lord
Rupert Murdoch than before he bought it: He has not "destroyed" it ...
so far, or messed-up his also classy TIMES OF LONDON so far as I know
because I do not read it (nor THE GUARDIAN)
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870456250457502196418028...
"BEST NOVELS OF 2000"
Though not the trashiest & thus most lucrative novels of 2009 so far
as I know, because damnit I haven't read
nor listened to the audios of any
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870383700457501355332977...

Robert, the National Book Award (such as *Shadow Country* won) is /
commonly recognized/ as the nation's *premier* award [tho' it not be
*very much*, in signet or import]. For a "traditional publisher" you
seem to have some trouble with /readymades/ of the industry: others
have similar difficulties some-times, but perhaps you should not
embarrass *yourself*. SRSLY, as the 'kids' are wont to write.

michael

2010-01-24 23:28:26 UTC

Perhaps he only reads Stephanie Meyer:)
--
www.TheEnglishCollection.com

Jeff Rubard

2010-01-25 00:24:29 UTC

Post by michael
Perhaps he only reads Stephanie Meyer:)
--www.TheEnglishCollection.com

A FINE ARTHUR THIS

Robert Cohen

2010-01-25 01:48:12 UTC

Post by michael
Perhaps he only reads Stephanie Meyer:)
--www.TheEnglishCollection.com

A FINE ARTHUR THIS

To: Big Red

If my publishing company is considered a shonda, then your's
is not exactly shameless

If nobody reads my touts, then what bodies
are ignoring you?

Let's face reality, neither pesteror
is being herein acknowledged

The n.g. members are busy with the real
world, and I suspect more than a few are
composing manuscripts

The interesting question is: Are the compositions ambitiously
approaching
literary literature (logicallly your type of non-responders),
middlebrow and/or
merely lucrative-schlock-meisters (mine) ?

And who is the less humorless & who is more offensive?

I nominate myself as magnanimous and you
as ego-centric <not really total opposites but close>

And if I don't convey a complete orthodox-structured
idea, then your style is frankly self-indulgent
if not obscure, and deliberately flakey with esoteric
abbreviation

You've posted books of which
I'm oblivious--can ya present your prolific
publishing company's list as interesting, to motivate
the reader to seek out from the taxpayers' stacks
'n stacks at public libraries, Borders et cetera?

michael

2010-01-25 03:12:34 UTC

I am really shocked that both of you have ligitimate publishing companies,
and that you promote them by flooding this news group with posts which only
the two of you read. If you haven't noticed you and me and perhaps one more
seem to be the only ones in here.
--
www.TheEnglishCollection.com

Post by michael
Perhaps he only reads Stephanie Meyer:)
--www.TheEnglishCollection.com

A FINE ARTHUR THIS

Robert Cohen

2010-01-25 14:44:06 UTC

Post by michael
I am really shocked that both of you have ligitimate publishing companies,
and that you promote them by flooding this news group with posts which only
the two of you read. If you haven't noticed you and me and perhaps one more
seem to be the only ones in here.
--www.TheEnglishCollection.com

Post by michael
Perhaps he only reads Stephanie Meyer:)
--www.TheEnglishCollection.com

A FINE ARTHUR THIS

To: Big Red
If my publishing company is considered a shonda, then your's
is not exactly shameless
If nobody reads my touts, then what bodies
are ignoring you?
Let's face reality, neither pesteror
is being herein acknowledged
The n.g. members are busy with the real
world, and I suspect more than a few are
composing manuscripts
The interesting question is: Are the compositions ambitiously
approaching
literary literature (logicallly your type of non-responders),
middlebrow and/or
merely lucrative-schlock-meisters (mine) ?
And who is the less humorless & who is more offensive?
I nominate myself as magnanimous and you
as ego-centric <not really total opposites but close>
And if I don't convey a complete orthodox-structured
idea, then your style is frankly self-indulgent
if not obscure, and deliberately flakey with esoteric
abbreviation
You've posted books of which
I'm oblivious--can ya present your prolific
publishing company's list as interesting, to motivate
the reader to seek out from the taxpayers' stacks
'n stacks at public libraries, Borders et cetera?

Non-Justice robtcohen concurs with our Chief Judge Ad Hoc Michael

But I don't get te Stephanie Meyer allusion

Is she really ALLEGEDLY John Milton's bastard heiress?

The Milton's had changed their surname to that slightly waspier
"Meyer"
as the fish 'n chips 'n beer 'n darts afficiandos Iliterata were
speculating
before hooliganizing another World Fish Carp football game

Big Red Jeff Rubard

2010-01-26 18:55:59 UTC

Post by michael
Perhaps he only reads Stephanie Meyer:)
--www.TheEnglishCollection.com

A FINE ARTHUR THIS

To: Big Red
If my publishing company is considered a shonda, then your's
is not exactly shameless
If nobody reads my touts, then what bodies
are ignoring you?
Let's face reality, neither pesteror
is being herein acknowledged
The n.g. members are busy with the real
world, and I suspect more than a few are
composing manuscripts
The interesting question is: Are the compositions ambitiously
approaching
literary literature (logicallly your type of non-responders),
middlebrow and/or
merely lucrative-schlock-meisters (mine) ?
And who is the less humorless & who is more offensive?
I nominate myself as magnanimous and you
as ego-centric <not really total opposites but close>
And if I don't convey a complete orthodox-structured
idea, then your style is frankly self-indulgent
if not obscure, and deliberately flakey with esoteric
abbreviation
You've posted books of which
I'm oblivious--can ya present your prolific
publishing company's list as interesting, to motivate
the reader to seek out from the taxpayers' stacks
'n stacks at public libraries, Borders et cetera?

Non-Justice robtcohen concurs with our Chief Judge Ad Hoc Michael
But I don't get te Stephanie Meyer allusion
Is she really ALLEGEDLY John Milton's bastard heiress?
The Milton's had changed their surname to that slightly waspier
"Meyer"
as the fish 'n chips 'n beer 'n darts afficiandos Iliterata were
speculating
before hooliganizing another World Fish Carp football game

For reality: NOBELISTS ARE LOSERS! *et cetera*.

Robert Cohen

2010-01-26 20:25:31 UTC

On Jan 26, 1:55 pm, Big Red Jeff Rubard

Post by michael
Perhaps he only reads Stephanie Meyer:)
--www.TheEnglishCollection.com

A FINE ARTHUR THIS

To: Big Red
If my publishing company is considered a shonda, then your's
is not exactly shameless
If nobody reads my touts, then what bodies
are ignoring you?
Let's face reality, neither pesteror
is being herein acknowledged
The n.g. members are busy with the real
world, and I suspect more than a few are
composing manuscripts
The interesting question is: Are the compositions ambitiously
approaching
literary literature (logicallly your type of non-responders),
middlebrow and/or
merely lucrative-schlock-meisters (mine) ?
And who is the less humorless & who is more offensive?
I nominate myself as magnanimous and you
as ego-centric <not really total opposites but close>
And if I don't convey a complete orthodox-structured
idea, then your style is frankly self-indulgent
if not obscure, and deliberately flakey with esoteric
abbreviation
You've posted books of which
I'm oblivious--can ya present your prolific
publishing company's list as interesting, to motivate
the reader to seek out from the taxpayers' stacks
'n stacks at public libraries, Borders et cetera?

Non-Justice robtcohen concurs with our Chief Judge Ad Hoc Michael
But I don't get te Stephanie Meyer allusion
Is she really ALLEGEDLY John Milton's bastard heiress?
The Milton's had changed their surname to that slightly waspier
"Meyer"
as the fish 'n chips 'n beer 'n darts afficiandos Iliterata were
speculating
before hooliganizing another World Fish Carp football game

For reality: NOBELISTS ARE LOSERS! *et cetera*.

For harsh fantasy: nobles are pretentious bluebloods: go to local
emergency room, and observe
the deference they give to the near-drownings & heart attacks, while
obvious commoners
leaking red corpuscles are ignored

I need to re-word the terrifically punishing antic-dope with blue and/
or purplish afflictions

Jeff Rubard

2010-01-29 19:20:21 UTC

Post by Robert Cohen
On Jan 26, 1:55 pm, Big Red Jeff Rubard

Post by michael
Perhaps he only reads Stephanie Meyer:)
--www.TheEnglishCollection.com

A FINE ARTHUR THIS

To: Big Red
If my publishing company is considered a shonda, then your's
is not exactly shameless
If nobody reads my touts, then what bodies
are ignoring you?
Let's face reality, neither pesteror
is being herein acknowledged
The n.g. members are busy with the real
world, and I suspect more than a few are
composing manuscripts
The interesting question is: Are the compositions ambitiously
approaching
literary literature (logicallly your type of non-responders),
middlebrow and/or
merely lucrative-schlock-meisters (mine) ?
And who is the less humorless & who is more offensive?
I nominate myself as magnanimous and you
as ego-centric <not really total opposites but close>
And if I don't convey a complete orthodox-structured
idea, then your style is frankly self-indulgent
if not obscure, and deliberately flakey with esoteric
abbreviation
You've posted books of which
I'm oblivious--can ya present your prolific
publishing company's list as interesting, to motivate
the reader to seek out from the taxpayers' stacks
'n stacks at public libraries, Borders et cetera?

Non-Justice robtcohen concurs with our Chief Judge Ad Hoc Michael
But I don't get te Stephanie Meyer allusion
Is she really ALLEGEDLY John Milton's bastard heiress?
The Milton's had changed their surname to that slightly waspier
"Meyer"
as the fish 'n chips 'n beer 'n darts afficiandos Iliterata were
speculating
before hooliganizing another World Fish Carp football game

For reality: NOBELISTS ARE LOSERS! *et cetera*.

For harsh fantasy: nobles are pretentious bluebloods: go to local
emergency room, and observe
the deference they give to the near-drownings & heart attacks, while
obvious commoners
leaking red corpuscles are ignored
I need to re-word the terrifically punishing antic-dope with blue and/
or purplish afflictions- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Robat Cohen, Here is a poem I wrote.

I saw a Chapel

I saw a chapel all of gold
That none did dare to enter in,
And many weeping stood without,
Weeping, mourning, worshipping.

I saw a serpent rise between
The white pillars of the door,
And he forc'd and forc'd and forc'd,
Down the golden hinges tore.

And along the pavement sweet,
Set with pearls and rubies bright,
All his slimy length he drew
Till upon the altar white

Vomiting his poison out
On the bread and on the wine.
So I turn'd into a sty
And laid me down among the swine.

No I didn't. William Blake wrote that poem.
And what's more: I'm not ignored! So grow up.

Big Red Jeff Rubard

2010-01-29 19:23:15 UTC

Post by Robert Cohen
On Jan 26, 1:55 pm, Big Red Jeff Rubard

Post by michael
Perhaps he only reads Stephanie Meyer:)
--www.TheEnglishCollection.com

A FINE ARTHUR THIS

To: Big Red
If my publishing company is considered a shonda, then your's
is not exactly shameless
If nobody reads my touts, then what bodies
are ignoring you?
Let's face reality, neither pesteror
is being herein acknowledged
The n.g. members are busy with the real
world, and I suspect more than a few are
composing manuscripts
The interesting question is: Are the compositions ambitiously
approaching
literary literature (logicallly your type of non-responders),
middlebrow and/or
merely lucrative-schlock-meisters (mine) ?
And who is the less humorless & who is more offensive?
I nominate myself as magnanimous and you
as ego-centric <not really total opposites but close>
And if I don't convey a complete orthodox-structured
idea, then your style is frankly self-indulgent
if not obscure, and deliberately flakey with esoteric
abbreviation
You've posted books of which
I'm oblivious--can ya present your prolific
publishing company's list as interesting, to motivate
the reader to seek out from the taxpayers' stacks
'n stacks at public libraries, Borders et cetera?

Non-Justice robtcohen concurs with our Chief Judge Ad Hoc Michael
But I don't get te Stephanie Meyer allusion
Is she really ALLEGEDLY John Milton's bastard heiress?
The Milton's had changed their surname to that slightly waspier
"Meyer"
as the fish 'n chips 'n beer 'n darts afficiandos Iliterata were
speculating
before hooliganizing another World Fish Carp football game

For reality: NOBELISTS ARE LOSERS! *et cetera*.

For harsh fantasy: nobles are pretentious bluebloods: go to local
emergency room, and observe
the deference they give to the near-drownings & heart attacks, while
obvious commoners
leaking red corpuscles are ignored
I need to re-word the terrifically punishing antic-dope with blue and/
or purplish afflictions- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Robat Cohen, Here is a poem I wrote.
I saw a Chapel
I saw a chapel all of gold
That none did dare to enter in,
And many weeping stood without,
Weeping, mourning, worshipping.
I saw a serpent rise between
The white pillars of the door,
And he forc'd and forc'd and forc'd,
Down the golden hinges tore.
And along the pavement sweet,
Set with pearls and rubies bright,
All his slimy length he drew
Till upon the altar white
Vomiting his poison out
On the bread and on the wine.
So I turn'd into a sty
And laid me down among the swine.
No I didn't. William Blake wrote that poem.
And what's more: I'm not ignored! So grow up.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Furthermore, hun:
CRAZY

Big Red Jeff Rubard

2010-01-29 19:39:59 UTC

On Jan 29, 11:23 am, Big Red Jeff Rubard

Post by Robert Cohen
On Jan 26, 1:55 pm, Big Red Jeff Rubard

Post by michael
Perhaps he only reads Stephanie Meyer:)
--www.TheEnglishCollection.com

A FINE ARTHUR THIS

To: Big Red
If my publishing company is considered a shonda, then your's
is not exactly shameless
If nobody reads my touts, then what bodies
are ignoring you?
Let's face reality, neither pesteror
is being herein acknowledged
The n.g. members are busy with the real
world, and I suspect more than a few are
composing manuscripts
The interesting question is: Are the compositions ambitiously
approaching
literary literature (logicallly your type of non-responders),
middlebrow and/or
merely lucrative-schlock-meisters (mine) ?
And who is the less humorless & who is more offensive?
I nominate myself as magnanimous and you
as ego-centric <not really total opposites but close>
And if I don't convey a complete orthodox-structured
idea, then your style is frankly self-indulgent
if not obscure, and deliberately flakey with esoteric
abbreviation
You've posted books of which
I'm oblivious--can ya present your prolific
publishing company's list as interesting, to motivate
the reader to seek out from the taxpayers' stacks
'n stacks at public libraries, Borders et cetera?

Non-Justice robtcohen concurs with our Chief Judge Ad Hoc Michael
But I don't get te Stephanie Meyer allusion
Is she really ALLEGEDLY John Milton's bastard heiress?
The Milton's had changed their surname to that slightly waspier
"Meyer"
as the fish 'n chips 'n beer 'n darts afficiandos Iliterata were
speculating
before hooliganizing another World Fish Carp football game

For reality: NOBELISTS ARE LOSERS! *et cetera*.

For harsh fantasy: nobles are pretentious bluebloods: go to local
emergency room, and observe
the deference they give to the near-drownings & heart attacks, while
obvious commoners
leaking red corpuscles are ignored
I need to re-word the terrifically punishing antic-dope with blue and/
or purplish afflictions- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Robat Cohen, Here is a poem I wrote.
I saw a Chapel
I saw a chapel all of gold
That none did dare to enter in,
And many weeping stood without,
Weeping, mourning, worshipping.
I saw a serpent rise between
The white pillars of the door,
And he forc'd and forc'd and forc'd,
Down the golden hinges tore.
And along the pavement sweet,
Set with pearls and rubies bright,
All his slimy length he drew
Till upon the altar white
Vomiting his poison out
On the bread and on the wine.
So I turn'd into a sty
And laid me down among the swine.
No I didn't. William Blake wrote that poem.
And what's more: I'm not ignored! So grow up.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

CRAZY- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

"Additional", *little man*: HAND ON MY BONES AND THE /ENVELOPE DEMON/

Robert Cohen

2010-01-30 02:12:20 UTC

Post by Robert Cohen
On Jan 26, 1:55 pm, Big Red Jeff Rubard