Discussion:
Cognitive Grammar: QUICKLY I STEAL TO THE STEREOPTICON ["Nuvo-Benjamin?"]
(слишком старое сообщение для ответа)
Jeff Rubard
2010-02-03 18:24:06 UTC
Permalink
The American Pastime: Modernism (A Meadian Theory of Jazz)

“If you have to ask what jazz is, you ain’t never gonna know” —
Louis Armstrong

At this particular time, I would like to do something other than
“celebrate American tradition” by speaking of jazz music. All
throughout American history, various people have dreamt of “making it
new”: a new life in the New World, clean and scientific and modern and
meaningless. This is, unfortunately, not the quiddity of life in the
Republic: an absolute modernism that turns on the true “moment” and
the involution of “projection possibilities” fails to keep faith with
a history that keeps recapturing us and teaching us the lessons of
every second. From the man who could not tell a lie on to “the now”,
to accept the modernist charges has meant coping with a symbolic world
that does not achieve “closure” in the thoughts and dreams of the
concrete mind.

It is this way, too, with jazz. The story beloved of those who found
records from straight out of the vaults of freedom, c. 1960-1969,
unbelievable music is not quite true: Albert Ayler’s military music,
like the martial dance-steps of the itinerant city youth, evokes a
black musical tradition older than jazz. “Jazz” is from somewhere
else, and for something else: in short order, nowhere and nothing.

No music could be more wholly other than music as it had existed up to
a point where an “independent city” created a generation of people
capable of, among other things, speaking of Michelangelo in straitened
circumstances; as Harvey Pekar has pointed out, systematically
removing the traces of functional harmony and the “theologically
vaulted cosmos” predated the opening of the New York record industry:
from le jazz hot on, the only things being rung were changes.

When blue eyes were smoky like an opium den, life was not always so
nice: and to counterpoint Walter Benjamin, the modernism of jazz was a
“disequilibrating” force — with superior musicianship to no end, a
person is alone in their thoughts and their world, and the forward
momentum of a “plan” becomes less than questionable. The
connosieurship of jazz makes for one of the hardest truths around.

However, I would like to end the note by explaining the redemptive
promise of jazz, in the spirit of the American sociologist George
Herbert Mead. Mead’s signal innovation in pragmatist philosophy was a
theory of “taking the attitude of the other”, the mechanism by which
human beings come to have human uses for each other: systematically
considering the “history and theory” of another person’s mind. The
Meadian lesson of jazz is that we are not “all together in this”, we
are not moving ever-upward, our most intimate familiars have thoughts
we can never understand — and that one ought not to “exterminate all
the brutes”.

------ [!!]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iJ7bs4mTUY&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TU_RxWXijz0&feature=player_embedded

------ [!!]

http://www.amazon.com/Arcades-Project-Walter-Benjamin/dp/0674008022
[ROLF TIE-DE-MAAAAAN! DO DO DA DA DA DA DA]
http://www.amazon.com/Technological-Reproducibility-Other-Writings-Media/dp/0674024451/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpi_2
[Peace to Responsible Harvard and CPGB]
Jeff Rubard
2010-02-03 18:24:46 UTC
Permalink
On Feb 3, 10:24 am, Jeff Rubard <***@gmail.com> wrote:
> The American Pastime: Modernism (A Meadian Theory of Jazz)
>
>     “If you have to ask what jazz is, you ain’t never gonna know” —
> Louis Armstrong
>
> At this particular time, I would like to do something other than
> “celebrate American tradition” by speaking of jazz music. All
> throughout American history, various people have dreamt of “making it
> new”: a new life in the New World, clean and scientific and modern and
> meaningless. This is, unfortunately, not the quiddity of life in the
> Republic: an absolute modernism that turns on the true “moment” and
> the involution of “projection possibilities” fails to keep faith with
> a history that keeps recapturing us and teaching us the lessons of
> every second. From the man who could not tell a lie on to “the now”,
> to accept the modernist charges has meant coping with a symbolic world
> that does not achieve “closure” in the thoughts and dreams of the
> concrete mind.
>
> It is this way, too, with jazz. The story beloved of those who found
> records from straight out of the vaults of freedom, c. 1960-1969,
> unbelievable music is not quite true: Albert Ayler’s military music,
> like the martial dance-steps of the itinerant city youth, evokes a
> black musical tradition older than jazz. “Jazz” is from somewhere
> else, and for something else: in short order, nowhere and nothing.
>
> No music could be more wholly other than music as it had existed up to
> a point where an “independent city” created a generation of people
> capable of, among other things, speaking of Michelangelo in straitened
> circumstances; as Harvey Pekar has pointed out, systematically
> removing the traces of functional harmony and the “theologically
> vaulted cosmos” predated the opening of the New York record industry:
> from le jazz hot on, the only things being rung were changes.
>
> When blue eyes were smoky like an opium den, life was not always so
> nice: and to counterpoint Walter Benjamin, the modernism of jazz was a
> “disequilibrating” force — with superior musicianship to no end, a
> person is alone in their thoughts and their world, and the forward
> momentum of a “plan” becomes less than questionable. The
> connosieurship of jazz makes for one of the hardest truths around.
>
> However, I would like to end the note by explaining the redemptive
> promise of jazz, in the spirit of the American sociologist George
> Herbert Mead. Mead’s signal innovation in pragmatist philosophy was a
> theory of “taking the attitude of the other”, the mechanism by which
> human beings come to have human uses for each other: systematically
> considering the “history and theory” of another person’s mind. The
> Meadian lesson of jazz is that we are not “all together in this”, we
> are not moving ever-upward, our most intimate familiars have thoughts
> we can never understand — and that one ought not to “exterminate all
> the brutes”.
>
> ------ [!!]
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iJ7bs4mTUY&feature=player_embedded
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TU_RxWXijz0&feature=player_embedded
>
> ------ [!!]
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Arcades-Project-Walter-Benjamin/dp/0674008022
> [ROLF TIE-DE-MAAAAAN! DO DO DA DA DA DA DA]http://www.amazon.com/Technological-Reproducibility-Other-Writings-Me...
> [Peace to Responsible Harvard and CPGB]

For 'tha Illimitable', o'course.
Jeff Rubard
2010-02-03 18:25:02 UTC
Permalink
On Feb 3, 10:24 am, Jeff Rubard <***@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 3, 10:24 am, Jeff Rubard <***@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The American Pastime: Modernism (A Meadian Theory of Jazz)
>
> >     “If you have to ask what jazz is, you ain’t never gonna know” —
> > Louis Armstrong
>
> > At this particular time, I would like to do something other than
> > “celebrate American tradition” by speaking of jazz music. All
> > throughout American history, various people have dreamt of “making it
> > new”: a new life in the New World, clean and scientific and modern and
> > meaningless. This is, unfortunately, not the quiddity of life in the
> > Republic: an absolute modernism that turns on the true “moment” and
> > the involution of “projection possibilities” fails to keep faith with
> > a history that keeps recapturing us and teaching us the lessons of
> > every second. From the man who could not tell a lie on to “the now”,
> > to accept the modernist charges has meant coping with a symbolic world
> > that does not achieve “closure” in the thoughts and dreams of the
> > concrete mind.
>
> > It is this way, too, with jazz. The story beloved of those who found
> > records from straight out of the vaults of freedom, c. 1960-1969,
> > unbelievable music is not quite true: Albert Ayler’s military music,
> > like the martial dance-steps of the itinerant city youth, evokes a
> > black musical tradition older than jazz. “Jazz” is from somewhere
> > else, and for something else: in short order, nowhere and nothing.
>
> > No music could be more wholly other than music as it had existed up to
> > a point where an “independent city” created a generation of people
> > capable of, among other things, speaking of Michelangelo in straitened
> > circumstances; as Harvey Pekar has pointed out, systematically
> > removing the traces of functional harmony and the “theologically
> > vaulted cosmos” predated the opening of the New York record industry:
> > from le jazz hot on, the only things being rung were changes.
>
> > When blue eyes were smoky like an opium den, life was not always so
> > nice: and to counterpoint Walter Benjamin, the modernism of jazz was a
> > “disequilibrating” force — with superior musicianship to no end, a
> > person is alone in their thoughts and their world, and the forward
> > momentum of a “plan” becomes less than questionable. The
> > connosieurship of jazz makes for one of the hardest truths around.
>
> > However, I would like to end the note by explaining the redemptive
> > promise of jazz, in the spirit of the American sociologist George
> > Herbert Mead. Mead’s signal innovation in pragmatist philosophy was a
> > theory of “taking the attitude of the other”, the mechanism by which
> > human beings come to have human uses for each other: systematically
> > considering the “history and theory” of another person’s mind. The
> > Meadian lesson of jazz is that we are not “all together in this”, we
> > are not moving ever-upward, our most intimate familiars have thoughts
> > we can never understand — and that one ought not to “exterminate all
> > the brutes”.
>
> > ------ [!!]
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iJ7bs4mTUY&feature=player_embedded
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TU_RxWXijz0&feature=player_embedded
>
> > ------ [!!]
>
> >http://www.amazon.com/Arcades-Project-Walter-Benjamin/dp/0674008022
> > [ROLF TIE-DE-MAAAAAN! DO DO DA DA DA DA DA]http://www.amazon.com/Technological-Reproducibility-Other-Writings-Me...
> > [Peace to Responsible Harvard and CPGB]
>
> For 'tha Illimitable', o'course.

*O'course?*
Jeff Rubard
2010-02-03 18:25:23 UTC
Permalink
On Feb 3, 10:25 am, Jeff Rubard <***@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 3, 10:24 am, Jeff Rubard <***@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 3, 10:24 am, Jeff Rubard <***@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > The American Pastime: Modernism (A Meadian Theory of Jazz)
>
> > >     “If you have to ask what jazz is, you ain’t never gonna know” —
> > > Louis Armstrong
>
> > > At this particular time, I would like to do something other than
> > > “celebrate American tradition” by speaking of jazz music. All
> > > throughout American history, various people have dreamt of “making it
> > > new”: a new life in the New World, clean and scientific and modern and
> > > meaningless. This is, unfortunately, not the quiddity of life in the
> > > Republic: an absolute modernism that turns on the true “moment” and
> > > the involution of “projection possibilities” fails to keep faith with
> > > a history that keeps recapturing us and teaching us the lessons of
> > > every second. From the man who could not tell a lie on to “the now”,
> > > to accept the modernist charges has meant coping with a symbolic world
> > > that does not achieve “closure” in the thoughts and dreams of the
> > > concrete mind.
>
> > > It is this way, too, with jazz. The story beloved of those who found
> > > records from straight out of the vaults of freedom, c. 1960-1969,
> > > unbelievable music is not quite true: Albert Ayler’s military music,
> > > like the martial dance-steps of the itinerant city youth, evokes a
> > > black musical tradition older than jazz. “Jazz” is from somewhere
> > > else, and for something else: in short order, nowhere and nothing.
>
> > > No music could be more wholly other than music as it had existed up to
> > > a point where an “independent city” created a generation of people
> > > capable of, among other things, speaking of Michelangelo in straitened
> > > circumstances; as Harvey Pekar has pointed out, systematically
> > > removing the traces of functional harmony and the “theologically
> > > vaulted cosmos” predated the opening of the New York record industry:
> > > from le jazz hot on, the only things being rung were changes.
>
> > > When blue eyes were smoky like an opium den, life was not always so
> > > nice: and to counterpoint Walter Benjamin, the modernism of jazz was a
> > > “disequilibrating” force — with superior musicianship to no end, a
> > > person is alone in their thoughts and their world, and the forward
> > > momentum of a “plan” becomes less than questionable. The
> > > connosieurship of jazz makes for one of the hardest truths around.
>
> > > However, I would like to end the note by explaining the redemptive
> > > promise of jazz, in the spirit of the American sociologist George
> > > Herbert Mead. Mead’s signal innovation in pragmatist philosophy was a
> > > theory of “taking the attitude of the other”, the mechanism by which
> > > human beings come to have human uses for each other: systematically
> > > considering the “history and theory” of another person’s mind. The
> > > Meadian lesson of jazz is that we are not “all together in this”, we
> > > are not moving ever-upward, our most intimate familiars have thoughts
> > > we can never understand — and that one ought not to “exterminate all
> > > the brutes”.
>
> > > ------ [!!]
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iJ7bs4mTUY&feature=player_embedded
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TU_RxWXijz0&feature=player_embedded
>
> > > ------ [!!]
>
> > >http://www.amazon.com/Arcades-Project-Walter-Benjamin/dp/0674008022
> > > [ROLF TIE-DE-MAAAAAN! DO DO DA DA DA DA DA]http://www.amazon.com/Technological-Reproducibility-Other-Writings-Me...
> > > [Peace to Responsible Harvard and CPGB]
>
> > For 'tha Illimitable', o'course.
>
> *O'course?*

/O'course/.
Big Red Jeff Rubard
2010-02-12 01:27:05 UTC
Permalink
New Style: For America





The American Pastime: Modernism (A Meadian Theory of Jazz)




"If you have to ask what jazz is, you ain't never gonna know" --
Louis Armstrong


At this particular time, I would like to do something other than
"celebrate American tradition" by speaking of jazz music. All
throughout American history, various people have dreamt of "making it
new": a new life in the New World, clean and scientific and modern
and
meaningless. This is, unfortunately, not the quiddity of life in the
Republic: an absolute modernism that turns on the true "moment" and
the involution of "projection possibilities" fails to keep faith with
a history that keeps recapturing us and teaching us the lessons of
every second. From the man who could not tell a lie on to "the now",
to accept the modernist charges has meant coping with a symbolic
world
that does not achieve "closure" in the thoughts and dreams of the
concrete mind.


It is this way, too, with jazz. The story beloved of those who found
records from straight out of the vaults of freedom, c. 1960-1969,
unbelievable music is not quite true: Albert Ayler's military music,
like the martial dance-steps of the itinerant city youth, evokes a
black musical tradition older than jazz. "Jazz" is from somewhere
else, and for something else: in short order, nowhere and nothing.


No music could be more wholly other than music as it had existed up
to
a point where an "independent city" created a generation of people
capable of, among other things, speaking of Michelangelo in
straitened
circumstances; as Harvey Pekar has pointed out, systematically
removing the traces of functional harmony and the "theologically
vaulted cosmos" predated the opening of the New York record industry:
from le jazz hot on, the only things being rung were changes.


When blue eyes were smoky like an opium den, life was not always so
nice: and to counterpoint Walter Benjamin, the modernism of jazz was
a
"disequilibrating" force -- with superior musicianship to no end, a
person is alone in their thoughts and their world, and the forward
momentum of a "plan" becomes less than questionable. The
connosieurship of jazz makes for one of the hardest truths around.


However, I would like to end the note by explaining the redemptive
promise of jazz, in the spirit of the American sociologist George
Herbert Mead. Mead's signal innovation in pragmatist philosophy was a
theory of "taking the attitude of the other", the mechanism by which
human beings come to have human uses for each other: systematically
considering the "history and theory" of another person's mind. The
Meadian lesson of jazz is that we are not "all together in this", we
are not moving ever-upward, our most intimate familiars have thoughts
we can never understand -- and that one ought not to "exterminate all
the brutes".


------ [!!]


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iJ7bs4mTUY&feature=player_embedded


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TU_RxWXijz0&feature=player_embedded


------ [!!]


http://www.amazon.com/Arcades-Project-Walter-Benjamin/dp/0674008022
[ROLF TIE-DE-MAAAAAN! DO DO DA DA DA DA DA]
http://www.amazon.com/Technological-Reproducibility-Other-Writings-Me...
[Peace to Responsible Harvard and CPGB]

------ [!!]

TAKE A /GANDRO/:
http://www.ft.com/
http://online.wsj.com/
http://www.latimes.com/
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ -

---- [!!]

A Materialist Theory of Concepts Dec 20 2004

Concepts are general features of thought permitting of employment to
capture the structure of a given state of affairs. Can a concept be a
material thing? It seems to me that this is, from a materialist
standpoint, the wrong question to ask: a better question is "what
features of the material world do concepts correspond to?" These are
clearly not particulars, but rather the properties and relations
obtaining between particulars; such that one could say the material
face of the concept was in making available for thought features of
reality not permitting of proper instantiation. That is, a concept has
as its material counterpart every physical phenomenon the instances of
which are not individuated by the individual thinker, the "overhead"
of thinking physically about the world. A concept does not correspond
to the thing it enables thought about, but serves to make possible
simple general thought about the object: it is no disadvantage that
Frege's theory of concepts does not individuate them more finely than
their contributions to structured thought. Put this way, a concept is
no more problematic a piece of linguistic structure than a particle.

The consequence of the "non-referential" account of the constitution
of concepts is that problems with a materialist account of thought are
solved by specifying that concepts are not made out of a special "mind-
stuff", but rather are mere elements of thought whose representative
capacity derives from various objective linkages between thought and
reality, not an intrinsic power to represent possessed by the concept.
A materialist theory of thought can therefore include conceptual
thinking as not involving added particulars without compromising its
materialism: the brain and physical states of conceptuality are simply
various, in accordance with the lack of referential structure implicit
in concepts. Whether or not there are further consequences for the
understanding of concept-related particulars depends on how intricate
the non-conceptual reckoning with particulars is made out to be. This
"conceptual holism" has no other theoretical committments for the
materialist with an eye to incorporate concepts into the material view
of the world.

---- [!!]

V a ["gander"]:

The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation
(Hardcover)
http://www.amazon.com/Scientific-Life-History-Modern-Vocation/dp/0226750248

Richard A. Lanham
The Economics of Attention
Style and Substance in the Age of Information
326 pages, 27 halftones, 2 line drawings 6 x 9 (c) 2006
http://www.press.uchicago.edu/presssite/metadata.epl?mode=synopsis&bookkey=169917


-----


*Fur Asja* --
An EINBAHNSTRASSE!
[pant pant pant]
[Con'td.] [!!]
Jeff Rubard
2010-02-13 17:23:19 UTC
Permalink
On Feb 11, 5:27 pm, Big Red Jeff Rubard
<***@gmail.com> wrote:

> -----
>
> *Fur Asja* --
> An EINBAHNSTRASSE!
> [pant pant pant]
> [Con'td.] [!!]

But --

"Benjamin" was PRO DISTURBING; THE ANTICHRIST
/Discuss./
Loading...