Discussion:
Institutes of the *United States Government*: "Ño es verdád, baby!" ['Angel mi amor, these are the /facts/!']
(слишком старое сообщение для ответа)
Jeff Rubard
2010-02-02 03:54:12 UTC
Permalink
My parents went to Mass [*sans phrase* if you must have it] growing
up.
Then they didn't. They had various reasons for this.
I never did. I was encouraged not to believ-a in God-a, and /this I
did a "tollable" job of/.
I still don't, really. Not even J-WH O' Cardozo. [*Rail-lay*.]
I did a *causus lapsus*, which is how the "lapsed" Catholic
*indicates* [!!] the value of the faith for others is /known to them/,
by "tarrying" ten minutes during a sermon concerned with 'lay sisters'
and Edith Stein. Then I screamed out the name of my main bitch: "AL
SMITH!"
I did a translation of the Gospel of John with *mise en scenes* as a
'substitute' for Chick tracts.
"This I believe", /inna/ Canadian stylee.

JDR
Jeff Rubard
2010-02-02 03:57:57 UTC
Permalink
On Feb 1, 7:54 pm, Jeff Rubard <***@gmail.com> wrote:
> My parents went to Mass [*sans phrase* if you must have it] growing
> up.
> Then they didn't. They had various reasons for this.
> I never did. I was encouraged not to believ-a in God-a, and /this I
> did a "tollable" job of/.
> I still don't, really. Not even J-WH O' Cardozo. [*Rail-lay*.]
> I did a *causus lapsus*, which is how the "lapsed" Catholic
> *indicates* [!!] the value of the faith for others is /known to them/,
> by "tarrying" ten minutes during a sermon concerned with 'lay sisters'
> and Edith Stein. Then I screamed out the name of my main bitch: "AL
> SMITH!"
> I did a translation of the Gospel of John with *mise en scenes* as a
> 'substitute' for Chick tracts.
> "This I believe", /inna/ Canadian stylee.
>
> JDR

ADD: DEFAMATION. Is a *crime* for /anyone/ where the *least little
thing* is /never/ supposed to justify the *way you are treated*. It is
a serious breach of the law closely keyed to *our* American nation's
"freedom of confession" and affects *all alike*. GROW UP.
Jeff Rubard
2010-02-02 03:59:12 UTC
Permalink
> ADD: DEFAMATION. Is a *crime* for /anyone/ where the *least little
> thing* is /never/ supposed to justify the *way you are treated*. It is
> a serious breach of the law closely keyed to *our* American nation's
> "freedom of confession" and affects *all alike*. GROW UP.

New Style

ADD: DEFAMATION. Is a *crime* for /anyone/ where the *least little
thing* is /never/ supposed to 'justify' the *way you are treated*. It
is
a serious breach of the law closely keyed to *our* American nation's
"freedom of confession" and affects *all alike*. GROW UP,
'FUCKTARDS'. Less poison more "choisin".
Jeff Rubard
2010-02-02 03:59:59 UTC
Permalink
On Feb 1, 7:59 pm, Jeff Rubard <***@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ADD: DEFAMATION. Is a *crime* for /anyone/ where the *least little
> > thing* is /never/ supposed to justify the *way you are treated*. It is
> > a serious breach of the law closely keyed to *our* American nation's
> > "freedom of confession" and affects *all alike*. GROW UP.
>
> New Style
>
> ADD: DEFAMATION. Is a *crime* for /anyone/ where the *least little
> thing* is /never/ supposed to 'justify' the *way you are treated*. It
> is
> a serious breach of the law closely keyed to *our* American nation's
> "freedom of confession" and affects *all alike*. GROW UP,
> 'FUCKTARDS'. Less poison more "choisin".

SUP: EUGENE V. DEBS!
There, I said it.
/Not a difficult idea to get/.
*Idiots*.
Loading...